China bans GMOs from army food supply

china-bans-gmos-from-army-food-supply

The Chinese People's Liberation Army plans to ban the use of genetically modified foods from its supply chain, making the PLA the first military force in modern history to do so.

According to multiple reports, the decision comes following the publication last month of a report in an obscure Chinese government weekly by Lt. Gen. Mi Zhenyu, the former deputy director of the Chinese Academy of Military Science.

The English translation of Mi's essay was published just recently by Chen Yiwen, a senior official with the China Association for Disaster Prevention, on Chen's verified blog. According to the translated version, Mi charged that GMO residue of soybeans that are crushed to manufacture soy oil has found its way into the diets of Chinese citizens, thereby causing birth defects, depression, infertility and a rather lengthy list of additional afflictions.

What is worse, Mi asserts, is that the fault lies with China's largest supplier of oilseed — which is a thorn in the side of China's strategic planners.

"The U.S. dumped soybeans on China due to huge subsidies for their soybean farmers, and in a few years destroyed the traditional Chinese soybean industry," Mi claimed. The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that he could not immediately be reached to comment.

Part of a U.S. plot?

China's Agriculture Ministry has regularly denied claims of such "GMO leads," but Mi is just the latest military official to publicly come down on the side against GMO crops, and especially those from the United States. Last year, Maj. Gen. Peng Guangqian, the deputy secretary-general of China's National Security Policy Committee, also penned a column in which he warned that rising GMO grain imports would expose Chinese to a costly strategic error. Other top military leaders have just as publicly supported Peng.

As noted by WSJ:

The military men's positions underscore how closely GMO food is identified as a tool of Western — particularly U.S. — strategic policy, regardless of whether there's enough evidence to support the association. The broader public sentiment in China, mainly hinged on health factors, also runs against the notion of allowing GMO food for human consumption. That was the theme of the reaction to Greenpeace's claims that seven out of 15 random samples of rice sold in two markets in Wuhan tested positive for GMO strains. The non-profit said it had sent the samples to an independent testing agency.

Wuhan is the base for Huazhong Agricultural University, which is a major experimental institution for the government on GMO foods, and especially rice. School officials got into an argument with Greenpeace members last month after alleging that two employees of the activist group "stole" GMO rice seeds from somewhere on campus. A spokeswoman for the academic research institution told the Chinese daily paper Global Times that it rejects the activist organization's latest report and questioned its methods.

'Cadmium rice'

But China's bloggers were more apt to quickly side with Greenpeace. "There are also GMOs in Beijing!" one blogger wrote. "I wonder if markets there sell them too? It's so frightening! Municipal governments should clarify this!"

"We don't even know if GMOs are detrimental to health," said another. "All I want now is the right to know."

Regarding rice and other crops, China has additional problems besides GMOs — pollution.

In a "state secret" report, the Chinese government admitted last month that one-fifth of the country's agricultural land was polluted, and that China's southern rice fields were particularly contaminated.

Scientists and researchers have found hazardous levels of cadmium, arsenic, nickel, lead and mercury in rice grown near the Yangtze and Pearl River Deltas, the report said, according to the Financial Times. Previous investigations by Chinese media have turned up severe cadmium pollution in rice that is grown in the southern province of Hunan, which caused national alarm.

For more information and breaking news on GMOs, visit GMOs.NaturalNews.com.

Sources:

http://gmwatch.org
http://stream.wsj.com
http://boingboing.net
http://www.ft.com
http://science.naturalnews.com

Republished with permission from NaturalNews
​Written by J.D. Heyes

If you value what we do here, create your ad-free account and support our journalism.

Share:

Related articles



Your support makes a difference

Dear valued reader,

We hope that our website has been a valuable resource for you.

The reality is that it takes a lot of time, effort, and resources to maintain and grow this website. We rely on the support of readers like you to keep providing high-quality content.

If you have found our website to be helpful, please consider making a contribution to help us continue to bring you the information you need. Your support means the world to us and helps us to keep doing what we love.

Support us by choosing your support level – Silver, Gold or Platinum. Other support options include Patreon pledges and sending us a one-off payment using PayPal.

Thank you for your consideration. Your support is greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,
Teo Blašković

$5 /month

  • Ad-free account
  • Clean user interface and fast browsing
  • Direct communication with us via chat and email
  • Suggest new features, content and applications
  • Early access to new apps and features

$50 /year

$10 /month

  • Ad-free account
  • Clean user interface and fast browsing
  • Direct communication with us via chat and email
  • Suggest new features, content and applications
  • Early access to new apps and features

$100 /year

$25 /month

  • Ad-free account
  • Clean user interface and fast browsing
  • Direct communication with us via chat and email
  • Suggest new features, content and applications
  • Early access to new apps and features

$200 /year

You can also support us on Patreon

support us on patreon

or by sending us a one-off payment using PayPal:


Commenting rules and guidelines

We value the thoughts and opinions of our readers and welcome healthy discussions on our website. In order to maintain a respectful and positive community, we ask that all commenters follow these rules:

  • Treat others with kindness and respect.
  • Stay on topic and contribute to the conversation in a meaningful way.
  • Do not use abusive or hateful language.
  • Do not spam or promote unrelated products or services.
  • Do not post any personal information or content that is illegal, obscene, or otherwise inappropriate.

We reserve the right to remove any comments that violate these rules. By commenting on our website, you agree to abide by these guidelines. Thank you for helping to create a positive and welcoming environment for all.

2 Comments

  1. very soon there will be no food left suitable for human consumption…….food is now the weapon of choice to slowly and insidiously poison the worlds population , after all its just good business sense to make everyone sick , then all humans will have to take the big pharma's medicine to be fit enough to work so we can pay our tax's…….

  2. GMO's should ONLY be consumed by those involved in their creation AND those "lawmakers" who would attempt to pass laws to shove them down us "useless eater's" throats.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *