S1 (minor) solar radiation storm in progress after M7.3 solar flare on April 18

S1 (minor) solar radiation storm in progress after M7.3 solar flare on April 18

Support us AD-FREE

Producing content you read on this website takes a lot of time, effort, and hard work. If you value what we do here, please consider subscribing today.

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

Earth is currently under the influence of S1 (minor) solar radiation storm created as a result of yesterday's M7.3 solar flare. Our planet is showered with highly energetic solar particles (primarily protons) released from the flare site. Extended warning is now valid until 01:00 UTC on April 20, 2014. Duration of event will influence severity of effects.

Solar radiation storms (also known as Space Radiation Storms, Solar Proton Events or SPE) occur when explosions on the Sun accelerate solar protons toward Earth at very high speeds. When these protons arrive at Earth and enter the atmosphere over the polar regions, much enhanced ionization is produced at altitudes below 100 km. Ionization at these low altitudes is particularly effective in absorbing HF radio signals and can render HF communications impossible throughout the polar regions.

Solar radiation storms at this levels (S1) occur approximately 50 times in one solar cycle (~11 years).

Low Energy Electrons & Protons - 3-day graph (ACE RTSW EPAM). Image credit: NOAA / ACE

High Energy Protons - 3-day graph. (ACE RTSW SIS). Image credit: NOAA / ACE

Space Weather Message Code: WARPX1

Serial Number: 427
Issue Time: 2014 Apr 19 1347 UTC

EXTENDED WARNING: Proton 10MeV Integral Flux above 10pfu expected
Extension to Serial Number: 426
Valid From: 2014 Apr 18 1400 UTC
Now Valid Until: 2014 Apr 20 0100 UTC
Warning Condition: Persistence
Predicted NOAA Scale: S1 - Minor
Potential Impacts: Radio - Minor impacts on polar HF (high frequency) radio propagation resulting in fades at lower frequencies.

Global D-region absorption map at 16:04 UTC today. Image credit: NOAA / SWPC

Yesterday's solar flare that peaked as M7.3 lasted almost a full hour.

According to SWPC, it was accompanied by a Tenflare (1000 sfu), a Castelli-U signature, as well as Type II (851 km/s) and Type IV radio emissions. An asymmetric halo CME was subsequently observed in SOHO/LASCO C2 coronagraph imagery at 13:25 UTC. Analysis suggested the ejecta was moving at approximately 1000 km/s and is Earth-directed.

Image credit: NASA/ESA SOHO / Lasco C3 on April 18, 2014 at 15:30 UTC

Given the coronal mass ejection associated with this event and another observed on the 17th, the combined effects are expected to drive G1 (Minor) storming on the 20th and 21st. (SWPC)

The video below shows yesterday's M7.3 solar flare:

There are several regions on the disk with the potential for continued activity. Forecasters estimate 60% chance of M-class, and 10 % chance of X-class solar flares in next three days.

According to latest ​joint USAF/NOAA "Solar Geophysical Activity Report and Forecast" issued 22:00 UTC on April 18th, proton event probabilities for today are 99%, 75% for April 20, and 50% for April 21.

Featured image: NASA / SDO AIA 131

Register/become a supporter

Support us AD-FREE

Your support is crucial for our survival. It makes this project fully self-sustainable and keeps us independent and focused on the content we love to create and share. 

Monthly subscription

Subscription options

Yearly subscription

Subscription options

You'll receive your ad-free account for 20x faster browsing experience, clean interface without any distractions, ability to post comments without prior editorial check, all our desktop and mobile applications (current and upcoming) ad-free and with the full set of features available, a direct line of communication and much more. See all options.

Comments

Jamal Shrair 4 years ago

Can anyone ask the people at NASA if they still believe that the sun is in the beginning of minimum cycle. According to their opinion the Sun entered the minimum activity cycle in the end of the last year. I have been following their predictions since 1989 and almost all of them were wrong regarding both minimum and maximum cycles. The reason to me is quite obvious, but who will believe me? I cannot convince planet full of physicists. This is the sad reality.

Post a comment

Your name: *

Your email address: *

Comment text: *

The image that appears on your comment is your Gravatar