In a new study, scientists have warned that the Ridgecrest earthquakes in Southern California in 2019 could increase the chance of a San Andreas Fault earthquake. The probability is higher because the 2019 temblors stressed the Garlock Fault, which links the Ridgecrest faults with the San Andreas Fault.
If the Garlock Fault ruptured in a massive shock, it could possibly trigger a San Andreas earthquake north of Los Angeles, warned Ross Stein– the CEO of catastrophe modeling company Temblor, and Shinji Toda of Tohoku University.
"In our study, we developed a new method to forecast future seismicity," they wrote. "These forecasts are not earthquake predictions, which have so far proven impossible. Rather, they are probabilistic, framed in the language of chance."
"We use past seismicity, the stress imparted by recent large and moderate earthquakes and the equations governing how fault friction varies in time and space (‘rate-state friction’) to estimate the likelihood of future earthquakes of different sizes."
The scientists used machine learning technology, which estimates a 2.3 percent chance of an M7.7 Garlock Fault rupture in the following year.
Image credit: Ross S. Stein, Ph.D. and Shinji Toda, Ph.D./Temblor
"This is 100 times higher than its annual chances in the ‘UCERF3’ benchmark model for California, which is jointly issued by the [U.S. Geological Survey], the Southern California Earthquake Center, and the California Geological Survey."
If the Garlock Fault rupture within about 48 km (30 miles) of its junction with the San Andreas Fault, it would raise the chances of a San Andreas rupture that extends to the southeast, on the Mojave section, by a factor of around 150.
"That translates into a 50-50 chance of a San Andreas Mojave section rupture (with a range, 25 percent-67 percent), either immediately following a Garlock quake, or after some delay."
The scientists estimate that the net probability of a massive San Andreas quake in the next 12 months is 1.15 percent.
"While small, this probability is 3.5-5.0 times higher than the annual chance of a large San Andreas earthquake in the ‘UCERF3’ benchmark model for California."
"But, as we have seen during the COVID-19 pandemic, low probability chain-reaction events do occur in nature, and when they do, their consequences can be great," they continued.
"It is the responsibility of scientists to assess the likelihood of such events, and then to bring them to the attention of the public and decision-makers."
Image credit: Ross S. Stein, Ph.D. and Shinji Toda, Ph.D./Tremblor
Meanwhile, seismologist Lucy Jones, who was not part of the study, said it "assumes a reason for quake triggering that is not consensus."
"The possibility of a San Andreas quake at any time should already be part of your planning or you shouldn't be in California," she added.
Featured image credit: Ross S. Stein, Ph.D. and Shinji Toda, Ph.D./Temblor
If you value what we do here, create your ad-free account and support our journalism.
Your support makes a difference
Dear valued reader,
We hope that our website has been a valuable resource for you.
The reality is that it takes a lot of time, effort, and resources to maintain and grow this website. We rely on the support of readers like you to keep providing high-quality content.
If you have found our website to be helpful, please consider making a contribution to help us continue to bring you the information you need. Your support means the world to us and helps us to keep doing what we love.
Support us by choosing your support level – Silver, Gold or Platinum.
Other support options include Patreon pledges, one-off payments using PayPal and purchasing products from our webshop.
Thank you for your consideration. Your support is greatly appreciated.