· ·

Are human beings robots? Interview with Dr. Rupert Sheldrake


What is a human being? It is the ultimate question, to which institutional science offers surprising answers. The materialistic paradigm, which has dominated institutional science for well over a century, states that the essence of consciousness can be reduced to the physical components of the brain. However, does an alternative scientific perspective exist?

One of the most remarkable researchers into consciousness and the evolution of life is biologist Dr. Rupert Sheldrake. Dr. Sheldrake is the author of more than 80 scientific papers and ten books. He has won international acclaim for his experimental research on his hypothesis of morphic fields and morphic resonance. 

Dr. Sheldrake’s official website: http://www.sheldrake.org

Videotaped experiments featured in this presentation: Telephone Telepathy with the Nolan Sisters:http://www.sheldrake.org/videos/telephone-telepathy-with-the-nolan-sisters

Jaytee: A dog who knew when his owner was coming home: http://www.sheldrake.org/videos/jaytee-a-dog-who-knew-when-his-owner-was-coming-home-the-orf-experiment

Dr. Sheldrake’s responses to various self-styled skeptics’ misrepresentations of his research – Controversies and debates with skeptics: http://www.sheldrake.org/reactions/controversies

Source: The Thunderbolts Project

If you value what we do here, create your ad-free account and support our journalism.


Your support makes a difference

Dear valued reader,

We hope that our website has been a valuable resource for you.

The reality is that it takes a lot of time, effort, and resources to maintain and grow this website. We rely on the support of readers like you to keep providing high-quality content.

If you have found our website to be helpful, please consider making a contribution to help us continue to bring you the information you need. Your support means the world to us and helps us to keep doing what we love.

Support us by choosing your support level – Silver, Gold or Platinum. Other support options include Patreon pledges and sending us a one-off payment using PayPal.

Thank you for your consideration. Your support is greatly appreciated.

Teo Blašković

$5 /month

  • Ad-free account
  • Clean user interface and fast browsing
  • Direct communication with us via chat and email
  • Suggest new features, content and applications
  • Early access to new apps and features

$50 /year

$10 /month

  • Ad-free account
  • Clean user interface and fast browsing
  • Direct communication with us via chat and email
  • Suggest new features, content and applications
  • Early access to new apps and features

$100 /year

$25 /month

  • Ad-free account
  • Clean user interface and fast browsing
  • Direct communication with us via chat and email
  • Suggest new features, content and applications
  • Early access to new apps and features

$200 /year

You can also support us on Patreon

support us on patreon

or by sending us a one-off payment using PayPal:

Commenting rules and guidelines

We value the thoughts and opinions of our readers and welcome healthy discussions on our website. In order to maintain a respectful and positive community, we ask that all commenters follow these rules:

  • Treat others with kindness and respect.
  • Stay on topic and contribute to the conversation in a meaningful way.
  • Do not use abusive or hateful language.
  • Do not spam or promote unrelated products or services.
  • Do not post any personal information or content that is illegal, obscene, or otherwise inappropriate.

We reserve the right to remove any comments that violate these rules. By commenting on our website, you agree to abide by these guidelines. Thank you for helping to create a positive and welcoming environment for all.

One Comment

  1. Main point is that Sheldrake brings up real issues. I don’t know if his answers are always 100% right, but for example to explain species purely by genes needs some extra factors being involved in protein coding (in my opinion at least). To explain things simply by genes and survival of the fittest doesn’t very realistically support this level of biodiversity either. So I think we need these extra elements.

    I actually think many scientist would agree with this, They might not explain it by new field phenomena, but they might say maybe there exist deeper gene interaction, unknown layer of gene information or something similar. Point is, even if we would explain things by genetics, we might still have to alter our world view in some unknown way to make it truly work.

    While it doesn’t make panpsychism as something to just blindly embrace, it becomes a good hypothesis. I do find it realistic that there would be yet unknown life supporting factors in nature. Sheldrake has this theory of collective memory between species. When one understand that this in not something that is meant to be “a stable image”, but something that supports survival, one might speculate with some form of lamarckism where information from past few generations affects the way proteins are coded, or rather the way in which this genetic information starts to work as a complex unique unit. Of course many things affect it after that, but there really might be this yet unknown memory factor that supports panpsychism, something like “bodily memory” and so on.

    If there would be traces of this kind of very early instinctual memory between certain members of species, it explains some psychic phenomena as well (especially if some material bond would exist as well?). Of course this would take more speculative leap. But when formulated in the way I did here, I would definitely call myself as pan psychic. I think it can simply explain certain things in a much wider level.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *