Elwha River – The largest dam removal in US history

elwha-river-the-largest-dam-removal-in-us-history

For nearly 100 years, the Elwha and Glines Canyon Dams have disrupted natural processes, trapping sediment in the reservoirs and blocking fish migrations, which changed the ecology of the river downstream of the dams.

Several decades after building tha Elwha and Glines Canyon dams, their drawbacks prompted a decision by the Department of the Interior to remove them. The project comprised the largest dam removal in U.S. history. Removal of the Elwha Dam started in September 2011 and concluded in March 2012. Glines Canyon Dam is expected to be completely removed by the summer of 2013.

The Elwha River arises from headwaters in the Olympic Mountains and flows northward across Washington, emptying into the Strait of Juan de Fuca. In the early twentieth century, Thomas Aldwell decided to harness the river’s energy and secured enough investment money to establish the Olympic Power Company.

In 1910, construction  on the Elwha Dam began in 1910 and three years after it began generating hydropower. In the 1920s, the construction of another dam began in the Glines Canyon. Elwha and Glines Canyon dams stopped the migration of fish upriver for spawning because of lack off fish ladders. Salmon and steelhead disappeared above the Elwha Dam. These fish species had provided food for more than 100 other wildlife species along the river.

The dams also changed the landscape. The construction of the Elwha Dam created Lake Aldwell, and the Glines Canyon Dam created Lake Mills. These reservoirs held back water but also sediment which could no longer replenish the riverbanks and coastline downstream.

The project along the Elwha is also the biggest controlled sediment release. One of the biggest changes is likely to result from releasing sediment trapped in the reservoirs. The Elwha and Glines Canyon dams trapped an estimated 19 million cubic meters of sediment.

Researchers with the U.S. Geological Survey forecast that removal of the dams would release 7 to 8 million cubic meters of sediment downstream. Removal of the dams proceeded at a measured pace in order to prevent the release of too much silt, clay, and sand too quickly.

The material left behind was to be planted with native species. The recent satellite images show a work in progress. The reservoir had largely drained, but the sediment was still barren and awaiting replanting.

Sources: USGS, Aqua/MODIS

Featured image: Construction crews begin removing the Elwha Dam (Credit: Mark Johnson)

If you value what we do here, open your ad-free account and support our journalism.

Share:

Producing content you read on this website takes a lot of time, effort, and hard work. If you value what we do here, select the level of your support and register your account.

Your support makes this project fully self-sustainable and keeps us independent and focused on the content we love to create and share.

All our supporters can browse the website without ads, allowing much faster speeds and a clean interface. Your comments will be instantly approved and you’ll have a direct line of communication with us from within your account dashboard. You can suggest new features and apps and you’ll be able to use them before they go live.

You can choose the level of your support.

Stay kind, vigilant and ready!

$5 /month

  • Ad-free account
  • Instant comments
  • Direct communication
  • New features and apps suggestions
  • Early access to new apps and features

$50 /year

$10 /month

  • Ad-free account
  • Instant comments
  • Direct communication
  • New features and apps suggestions
  • Early access to new apps and features

$100 /year

$25 /month

  • Ad-free account
  • Instant comments
  • Direct communication
  • New features and apps suggestions
  • Early access to new apps and features

$200 /year

You can also support us by sending us a one-off payment using PayPal:

One Comment

  1. I am all for conservation of a species, but abuse on both sides albeit private or government agencies are guilty when it comes to government regulation.

    The asininity of wasteful multimillion dollar tax payer projects that does more destruction then solving the problem when in reality there never was a problem.

    True example. Private property owner own’s land including creek with water rights is told by government agency he can no longer remove felled trees from creek that causes flooding/damage (cease and desist), which he does.

    DOW begins digging unnatural/manmade water channels on private property creek to ensure longevity of salmon population.

    DOW additional water channel program fails on private property because we all know salmon instinctively swim to places where they “originally” spawned, called imprinting no matter the place they were spawned e.g., fish hatchery or a stream.

    Observing nature and common sense doesn’t require a PhD to realize how instinctively animals migrate to known feeding/spawning grounds.

    His land is now deemed wetlands and is protected by federal government law and he can no longer remove said felled trees flooding his land seasonally and the salmon continue to instinctively migrate to known spawning grounds as they have done for millennia . All this for someone’s pet project in the federal government.

    for the betterment of the community.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published.