Confirmed: EPA Rigged RADNET Japan Nuclear Radiation Monitoring Equipment To Report Lower Levels Of Fukushima Fallout

confirmed-epa-rigged-radnet-japan-nuclear-radiation-monitoring-equipment-to-report-lower-levels-of-fukushima-fallout

The EPA re-calibrated (rigged) Japan nuclear radiation monitoring equipment causing them to report lower levels of radioactive fallout after the Fukushima nuclear meltdown than what was detected before the disaster.

I recently programmed an application to pull all of the EPA radiation monitoring graphs for all major US cities and complied them into an easy to use web interface. Of course we took the date being reported with a grain of salt under the suspicion that the Feds were fiddling with the results.

Now, an investigative report looking into why the much of the EPA radiation monitoring equipment was offline when the Fukushima nuclear meltdown occurred reveals that EPA has in fact rigged radiation monitoring equipment to report lower values of radiation.

RadNet or SadNet? The EPA’s Failed Radiation Detection System

RadNet – the EPA’s front-line, radiological detection network is severely flawed and suffers from maintenance and reliability issues.

The lack of consistent data and the number of units offline (a techie term for broken) at the time they were most needed shows that the EPA was not prepared for this emergency.

Besides that fact the broken system left us all unprotected; the confusion, apprehension and fear witnessed as people try to wade through the incomplete and inaccurate data online is evidenced by an exchange on the UC Berkely website over this RadNet graph:

 

EPA RadNet Sacramento - As Shown Here The Radnet Monitor Was Rigged To Report Lower Levels Of Radiation Following The Fukushima MeltdownEPA RadNet Sacramento – As Shown Here The Radnet Monitor Was Rigged To Report Lower Levels Of Radiation Following The Fukushima Meltdown 

 

The graph shows that this monitoring station was one of the units actually running on  3/11 . The readings were significantly higher prior to 3/11 and drop to a much lower level  afterwards. This is an indication that the units were running in an uncalibrated conditionand were adjusted only after the events at Fukushima.

Who is responsible for assuring that the system is up and running?  The EPA contracted this responsibility to a private company, Environmental Dimensions, Inc.

Environmental Dimensions, Inc (EDI) has provided maintenance for EPA’s RadNet monitoring systems under a sole source contract which can be viewed at the end of this article. The base amount of the contract is $238,000.00. This does not include materials and travel, which is billed back to the government as needed.

The contract was awarded to what is stated as a “Woman-owned 8(a) Small Disadvantaged Business“.  The disadvantaged woman in this case is EDI company president Patricia S. Bradshaw , former Deputy Under Secretary of Defense appointed by George Bush.

Could it possibly be that the corporate management at EDI formed the company not out of an altruistic sense of patriotic duty but to cash in on inside information and connections? Did Mrs. Bradshaw’s former DOD employment open the door? Did the fact that she heads a woman-owned business give her company a competitive edge?

EDI’s revenues have doubled in each of the past three years and they currently have 90 employees spread across offices in Albuquerque, Denver and Oak Ridge.

Read The Rest…

In reality, the US has seen an increase in radiation levels as evidenced by several nuclear fallout simulations, along with spikes in radiation in the drinking water, rainwater, milk, and food.

In fact, the graph above is not the only graph that is suspect either. Here are some more of the EPA RADNET radiation graphs that show drops in radiation levels, after the Fukushima meltdown, which should have shown increases.

Keep in mind, some clearly show spikes after the event but there is still a significant drop in the baseline levels of radiation. Other graphs show an unexplained drop-offs in radiation levels some time after the quake.




When I get time I will look through more of the older graphs. Right now the EPA graphs don’t go all the way back to March so the historical data is not available to see equipment re-calibration on those graphs.

Furthermore many of the graphs didn’t come online until after the disaster so there is no way to tell if the Feds rigged those monitors.

http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2011/05/19/confirmed-epa-rigged-radnet-japan-nuclear-radiation-monitoring-equipment-report-levels-nuclear-fallout-22823/

If you value what we do here, create your ad-free account and support our journalism.

Share:


Your support makes a difference

Dear valued reader,

We hope that our website has been a valuable resource for you.

The reality is that it takes a lot of time, effort, and resources to maintain and grow this website. We rely on the support of readers like you to keep providing high-quality content.

If you have found our website to be helpful, please consider making a contribution to help us continue to bring you the information you need. Your support means the world to us and helps us to keep doing what we love.

Support us by choosing your support level – Silver, Gold or Platinum. Other support options include Patreon pledges and sending us a one-off payment using PayPal.

Thank you for your consideration. Your support is greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,
Teo Blašković

$5 /month

  • Ad-free account
  • Clean user interface and fast browsing
  • Direct communication with us via chat and email
  • Suggest new features, content and applications
  • Early access to new apps and features

$50 /year

$10 /month

  • Ad-free account
  • Clean user interface and fast browsing
  • Direct communication with us via chat and email
  • Suggest new features, content and applications
  • Early access to new apps and features

$100 /year

$25 /month

  • Ad-free account
  • Clean user interface and fast browsing
  • Direct communication with us via chat and email
  • Suggest new features, content and applications
  • Early access to new apps and features

$200 /year

You can also support us on Patreon

support us on patreon

or by sending us a one-off payment using PayPal:


Commenting rules and guidelines

We value the thoughts and opinions of our readers and welcome healthy discussions on our website. In order to maintain a respectful and positive community, we ask that all commenters follow these rules:

  • Treat others with kindness and respect.
  • Stay on topic and contribute to the conversation in a meaningful way.
  • Do not use abusive or hateful language.
  • Do not spam or promote unrelated products or services.
  • Do not post any personal information or content that is illegal, obscene, or otherwise inappropriate.

We reserve the right to remove any comments that violate these rules. By commenting on our website, you agree to abide by these guidelines. Thank you for helping to create a positive and welcoming environment for all.

10 Comments

  1. The image regarding the RAD is totally wrong, my professor at university said that 750 RAD that is in the graph is way too much and ridiculous

  2. Despite claims that nuclear power is safer than ever, the severity of the accidents seems to be getting worse – Three-Mile Island, Chernobyl, now this. Where will we find ourselves as the nuclear network we have in this country ages? I think it has more potential to destabilize our society than anything else I know of.

  3. What amazes me is that we’re approaching 8 months of this spewing fallout and contamination. The deception is continuing. An Epic Fail becoming more EPIC by the day.

    The ‘spreadation’ or dispersion of radioactive contamination is accelerating and accumulating. Avoid the rain and SNOW, it’s going to be a bitter cold winter.

  4. john fichtner commented on The Watchers:

    It amazes me that here in the USA the headline news is all about the court case over that casey lady. Meanwhile there is 100 million people who are about to float away into the Ocean but before they do, they’re gonna swallow up a bunch of radiation and the whole time be expected to believe in a conspiracy to cover the entire thing up. Meanwhile the rest of the world just turns their cheek. This is genocide and we are no worse than Hitler for it.

  5. Wait till they see in a few years what starts coming out of the water. lol We will be saying, “it used to be a whale or a shark or a octopus”. The mutations that will begin to take place as a result of the radiation are going to blow peoples minds.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *