Cloud seeding flight suspected to aggravate major flooding in Tasmania


A cloud-seeding company Hydro Tasmania performed the seeding over the Derwent River watershed a day before the widespread flooding, caused by intense rainstorms, began on June 6, 2016. According to Premier Will Hodgman, the Energy Minister Matthew Groom is looking for an explanation as to why the seeding was authorized despite the heavy rainfalls already forecast.

Cloud seeding is a process of changing the amounts or types of precipitation by adding substances into the air that act in support of cloud condensation or ice nuclei, altering the microphysical processes occurring within the clouds.

Hydro Tasmania confirmed it conducted a cloud seeding flight on the day the storms were about to sweep the region. The flights took place on the morning of June 5 (local time) when flood warnings were already in the place in the northern area. The procedure went on for over an hour north of the Great Lake and was targeting the Upper Derwent catchment that provides water to several hydroelectric dams downstream.

Image credit: Hydro Tasmania

The Australian Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) confirmed there were flood warnings in place for several areas in Tasmania at the time of seeding flight.

"The first media release alerting the Tasmanian community to likely impacts of the event was issued on Friday, June 3. Detailed updates have been provided directly to the local media throughout the event. The first flood warnings were issued on Saturday afternoon: six to 12 hours before the significant rain began to fall across northern Tasmania," a weather bureau spokesperson said.

The catchment flooded on June 6 near Ouse, following torrential downpours a day earlier. First minor flooding warning was issued late evening on June 5 (local time) after the cloud seeding was already conducted. Major flood warnings were put in effect on the following day, for seven rivers, including Derwent and Ouse.

In the northern Tasmania, one person died in flood-related incidents, and one is still missing.

Video credit: Nigel Baker

Ouse farmers demand knowing why the cloud seeding took place, as they suffered major sheep and cattle losses, and infrastructural damages.

"The extent to which cloud seeding has exaggerated the flood is still to be determined of course, but the evidence from previous cloud seeding operations is that it works and therefore it will have exaggerated the flood to some extent. The Hydro has always claimed positive results from cloud seeding," said Scott Ashton-Jones, one of the affected farmers.

"We want to understand whether the cloud seeding has helped to create this massive flood from the local rivers which we've never ever seen. If the Hydro have had something to do with that with their cloud seeding, well we want to understand that because in the future we need to have closer information," said George Mills.

Hydro Tasmania released an official statement on June 10. They claim no flood warnings have been put in effect for the Upper Derwent at the time of the flight, and that the area did receive a substantial, although not excessive, amount of rainfall, following the seeding. They also stated the water in the Ouse River came from overtopping of Lake August, which is not in the catchment targeted by the flight.

Featured image credit: Nigel Baker

If you value what we do here, open your ad-free account and support our journalism.


Producing content you read on this website takes a lot of time, effort, and hard work. If you value what we do here, select the level of your support and register your account.

Your support makes this project fully self-sustainable and keeps us independent and focused on the content we love to create and share.

All our supporters can browse the website without ads, allowing much faster speeds and a clean interface. Your comments will be instantly approved and you’ll have a direct line of communication with us from within your account dashboard. You can suggest new features and apps and you’ll be able to use them before they go live.

You can choose the level of your support.

Stay kind, vigilant and ready!

$5 /month

  • Ad-free account
  • Instant comments
  • Direct communication
  • New features and apps suggestions
  • Early access to new apps and features

$50 /year

$10 /month

  • Ad-free account
  • Instant comments
  • Direct communication
  • New features and apps suggestions
  • Early access to new apps and features

$100 /year

$25 /month

  • Ad-free account
  • Instant comments
  • Direct communication
  • New features and apps suggestions
  • Early access to new apps and features

$200 /year

You can also support us by sending us a one-off payment using PayPal:

One Comment

  1. Why the heck can’t ‘man’ and governments leave ‘nature’ alone. This recent major rain event would have been enough on it’s own to cause the damage to the communities and persons that it did – sadly. Our weather systems, in the southern part of Australia particularly, have provided much needed rain for our farmers etc.. If cloud seeding (which I personally am angry about – it’s components and use) was used and perhaps increased the level of destruction caused to my island neighbours, then the one who authorized and condones ‘seeding’ has a big problem brewing from the community response. I feel that the whole/many of Australia/n’s is/will be watching this story with great interest and want answers re: seeding and if it was in any way responsible for increasing the damage the major weather system caused…..

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published.