Dr. A.P. David: On The Laws Of Nature – EU2014

ap-david-on-the-laws-of-nature-eu2014

AP David's talk considered the sources of the modern idea of 'Laws of Nature,' or as they are more usually known nowadays, 'physical laws.' He began by articulating the difference between descriptive and prescriptive laws: nature as directly observed versus nature idealized into geometric or other mathematical relationships. This beginning leads to surprisingly large consequences for the way in which new ideas are received by the gatekeepers of mainstream cosmology.

It turns out that the revolutionary thinkers of The Enlightenment found in the Laws of Nature an attractive "divine" quality. In particular they saw ideal geometries in planetary and other celestial motions. David will suggest that the willful conflation of descriptive and prescriptive tenets in modern science, especially but not only in mathematical physics, has led to some dire consequences for science itself. He believes that as EU theorists offer their electrical interpretations, it is critically important to understand the religious nature of institutionalized resistance.

Dr. A.P. David is a classical scholar (Hellenist), who has published two academic works including The Dance of the Muses: Choral Theory and Ancient Greek Poetics, Plato's New Measure: The 'Indeterminate Dyad' and self-published several works of fiction and poetry. danceofthemuses.org

Video courtesy of Thunderbolts Project

Thunderbolts Project Home: http://www.thunderbolts.info

If you value what we do here, open your ad-free account and support our journalism.

Share:

Producing content you read on this website takes a lot of time, effort, and hard work. If you value what we do here, select the level of your support and register your account.

Your support makes this project fully self-sustainable and keeps us independent and focused on the content we love to create and share.

All our supporters can browse the website without ads, allowing much faster speeds and a clean interface. Your comments will be instantly approved and you’ll have a direct line of communication with us from within your account dashboard. You can suggest new features and apps and you’ll be able to use them before they go live.

You can choose the level of your support.

Stay kind, vigilant and ready!

$5 /month

  • Ad-free account
  • Instant comments
  • Direct communication
  • New features and apps suggestions
  • Early access to new apps and features

$50 /year

$10 /month

  • Ad-free account
  • Instant comments
  • Direct communication
  • New features and apps suggestions
  • Early access to new apps and features

$100 /year

$25 /month

  • Ad-free account
  • Instant comments
  • Direct communication
  • New features and apps suggestions
  • Early access to new apps and features

$200 /year

You can also support us by sending us a one-off payment using PayPal:

2 Comments

  1. One admits that the logical, can be most damaging, and that only the most logical, would know what to place in the displaced…

    An ordered displacement {government change over, military coup, sacking, etc}, would be a gradual placement, but, its the same with a non ordered displacement {anarchy, death, suffering}, a gradually ordered placement {peace/comfort}, ruin is partial, one third….13

    Unit of one {united under one}, and one is three. ▲ earth, water, air, gives you spark.
    ^Knowledge{science}, defined of and by the realm, actual maths of an ordered shape{symmetrical geom}…

    ^absolute number of one is three, or ▲ one ninth equals 10. whole unit, in one unit. 3rd of a ninth. 3

    Even the UN use it. 'unit of one'

    Nice talk… 🙂

  2. Sir,we can achieve speed of light 'n' even we can travel faster than speed of light.

    I just want to brief out the simulation experiment regarding the same.

    Practical: Traveling with Speed of light:-
    Requirements:
    a:A dynamic length varying rod.
    b:A circular motion with more than 7200 rpm 'n' with dynamically co-ordinate changing property.
    c:considering constraints of streaming motion.

    Sir,
    I can prove mine vision with a simulation experiment with fundamental Physics and computational model . please feel free if u you think i can innovate.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published.