Neutrinos are faster than light according to new tests


OPERA collaboration shocked the world in September with the announcement that the ghostly subatomic particles called neutrinos had arrived at the Gran Sasso mine in Italy about 60 nanoseconds faster than light speed from the CERN particle accelerator near Geneva, Switzerland, 730 kilometres away. It was one of the most staggering results in physics.

Although the detectors in Italy can pinpoint the neutrinos’ time of arrival to within nanoseconds, it’s less clear when they left the accelerator at CERN. The neutrinos are produced by slamming protons into a bar-shaped target, sparking a cascade of subatomic particles. If the neutrinos were produced at one end of the bar rather than the other, it could obscure their time of flight.

Some theories posit that there are extra, hidden dimensions beyond the familiar four (three of space, one of time). It’s possible that the speedy neutrinos tunnel through these extra dimensions, reducing the distance they have to travel to get to the target. This would explain the measurement without requiring the speed of light to be broken.

After two additional weeks of observation scientist are now confident that neutrinos can go faster than light. Einstein’s theory of special relativity posits that nothing can travel faster than light, and many physicists believe the result could disappear in a puff of particles. So the theorists have been struggling to reconcile the September result with the laws of physics.

In period from October 21 to November 6 2011 the team ran a second set of measurements with 20 new neutrino hit experiments. The team also rechecked their statistical analysis, confirming that the error on their measurements was indeed 10 nanoseconds. Some team members had worried that the true error was larger but last results show the measurements “absolutely compatible” with the original announcement.

The lenght of fibre-optic cable that carries information from the underground lab at Gran Sasso to a data-collection centre on the surface is put on test also. The team is also trying to do the same test using another detector at the lab called RPC. That test will take another several months. (NewScientist)

Tommaso Dorigo, a physicist at CERN, noted on his blog that there are still other possible sources of error. For instance, the OPERA collaboration’s clock might not have a fine enough resolution to determine exactly when the neutrinos arrived. The measurement therefore would be only a ‘partial’ confirmation of the earlier result he stated.

Ultimately, the only thing that would convince many in the field is if another team upholds the findings in an independent experiment. Plunkett, co-spokesperson for the Main Injector Neutrino Oscillation Search (MINOS) experiment at Fermilab, says that his collaboration expects to have results checking the OPERA findings in the spring of 2012. (Wired)

This results can be confirmed by other experiments such as the MINOS experiment at Fermilab or the T2K experiment in Japan in orded to get scientists concensus. There are a number of experiments that are online or coming online that could be upgraded to do this measurement. In 2007, the MINOS experiment searched for faster-than-light neutrinos but didn’t see anything statistically significant. Learn more about Neutrinos.

Neutrinos: Complete guide to the ghostly particle


If you value what we do here, create your ad-free account and support our journalism.


Your support makes a difference

Dear valued reader,

We hope that our website has been a valuable resource for you.

The reality is that it takes a lot of time, effort, and resources to maintain and grow this website. We rely on the support of readers like you to keep providing high-quality content.

If you have found our website to be helpful, please consider making a contribution to help us continue to bring you the information you need. Your support means the world to us and helps us to keep doing what we love.

Support us by choosing your support level – Silver, Gold or Platinum. Other support options include Patreon pledges and sending us a one-off payment using PayPal.

Thank you for your consideration. Your support is greatly appreciated.

Teo Blašković

$5 /month

  • Ad-free account
  • Clean user interface and fast browsing
  • Direct communication with us via chat and email
  • Suggest new features, content and applications
  • Early access to new apps and features

$50 /year

$10 /month

  • Ad-free account
  • Clean user interface and fast browsing
  • Direct communication with us via chat and email
  • Suggest new features, content and applications
  • Early access to new apps and features

$100 /year

$25 /month

  • Ad-free account
  • Clean user interface and fast browsing
  • Direct communication with us via chat and email
  • Suggest new features, content and applications
  • Early access to new apps and features

$200 /year

You can also support us on Patreon

support us on patreon

or by sending us a one-off payment using PayPal:

Commenting rules and guidelines

We value the thoughts and opinions of our readers and welcome healthy discussions on our website. In order to maintain a respectful and positive community, we ask that all commenters follow these rules:

  • Treat others with kindness and respect.
  • Stay on topic and contribute to the conversation in a meaningful way.
  • Do not use abusive or hateful language.
  • Do not spam or promote unrelated products or services.
  • Do not post any personal information or content that is illegal, obscene, or otherwise inappropriate.

We reserve the right to remove any comments that violate these rules. By commenting on our website, you agree to abide by these guidelines. Thank you for helping to create a positive and welcoming environment for all.


  1. I am hghily, hghily doubtful. There have been lots and lots of measurements of neutrino speed that disagree with this one.One of the more famous is the supernova back in 1987 (I think) the light and neutrinos showed up at the same time. Considering its distance, even the tiny difference that they think they’ve found here would have come out to be huge. We would have seen a neutrino surge long before the light showed up.I think they claimed the neutrinos gained 60 billionths of a second in 2.4 milliseconds. If the supernova were merely 1 light year away, the neutrinos would have arrived about 788 seconds before the light. The supernova was 168,000 light years away, and so the neutrinos would have arrived about four years ahead of the light. We would have seen a very strong neutrino source in the sky suddenly appear 4 years before the supernova and then slowly taper away.That’s not what we saw, though. We saw the neutrinos taper away at the same rate as the light from the supernova.However, I am looking forward greatly to find out why the neutrinos are getting there first! This could be one of those Huh, that’s weird moments that results in a giant breakthrough!

  2. Can the Warp Drive be far off? Seems the physics of the 20th century may be headed for a massive revision. Along with the current paradigm shift occurring in our social order the 21st century may be the turning point needed to move beyond our current juvenile state.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *