# Einstein discarded 99.99% of the physical reality of the universe

The notion of space-time is an imaginary concept that was first introduced by the mathematician Hermann Minkowski. The original non-Euclidion geometry of Riemann dealt only with space as an amorphous continuum. But, Minkowski made it metric. Riemann did not present time as a separate dimension or new variable. He introduced it only as a supporting notion for his logarithm branch cuts.

"The abstract concept of n-dimensional geometry to facilitate the geometric representation of functions" of a complex variable (especially logarithm branch cut). Such researches have become a necessity for many parts of mathematics, e.g., for the treatment of many-valued analytical functions.

On the Hypotheses which lie at the Bases of Geometry, Bernhard Riemann. [Nature, Vol. VIII. Nos. 183, 184, pp. 14–17, 36, 37.] "A branch cut is a curve (with ends possibly open, closed, or half-open) in the complex plane across which an analytic multivalued function is discontinuous. For convenience, branch cuts are often taken as lines or line segments. Branch cuts (even those consisting of curves) are also known as cut lines (Arfken 1985, p. 397), slits (Kahan 1987), or branch lines."

A plot of the multi-valued imaginary part of the complex logarithm function, which shows the branches. As a complex number z goes around the origin, the imaginary part of the logarithm goes up or down. This makes the origin a branch point of the function. Credit: Leonid 2

Minkowski's four-dimensional space was transformed by using an imaginary (√-1.ct ) term instead of the real time t. So the coordinates of Minkowski's Four-Dimensional Continuum X1, X2, X3, X4 are all treated as space coordinates. Originally, they were X1, X2, X3,√-1. ct). In other words, the 4^{th} space dimension X4 is the imaginary term √-1.ct.

This imaginary 4-dimensional unification of time and space was named by Minkowski as 'world'. Minkowski’s 4^{th} dimension never intended to use it in curved space, and was meant to be Euclidean dimensions. Thus, in the physical sense, space-time as a fourth dimension is nothing more than Minkowski’s cerebral and mathematical imagination.

Einstein adapted Minkowski’s world and called it 'Spacetime Continuum'. Furthermore, he applied it to curved-None Euclidean measurements. But, he did not give any rational reason or physical explanations whatsoever why he did that. In fact, even today no physicist who believes in Einstein’s weird concept of 'Spacetime Continuum' can provide any explanations for it.

This is how time for mathematical reason became 4^{th} dimensional space. This baseless assumption from a physical point of view became the basic theory or rather the foundation for the concepts of spacetime curvature, ripples of spacetime etc. These concepts were further developed to so many other pseudo physics theories, like relativistic gravitation, which then went on to produce the Black Hole myth. Also, if there’s no such thing as spacetime, but only time and space, then the notion of singularity cannot be proposed. In other words, there’s no possibility of expanding space and time from a singularity at the beginning of time.

However, the concept of the curvature of space has no observational or experimental evidence. We can talk of curved lines, paths, and surfaces in space, but the notion that space itself can be curved has neither empirical evidence nor correct mathematical foundations. Thus, in the objective reality, not in the subjective reality of Einstein, the curvature of space is nothing more than a mathematical pipe-dream.

In 1938, in the book that he published with Leopold Infeld, The Evolution of physics, Einstein said, "Physical concepts are free creations of the human mind and are not, however, it may seem, uniquely determined by the physical world." The concept of the spacetime is definitely the free creation of Einstein’s mind not the reality of the physical world.

Nikola Tesla characterized the notion of curved spacetime as absurd, delusional and entirely impossible from a physics point of view. He is correct and his statements about it are the best he ever wrote.

"Supposing that the bodies act upon the surrounding space causing curving of the same, it appears to my simple mind that the curved spaces must react on the bodies, and produce the opposite effects, straightening out the curves. Since action and reaction are coexistent, it follows that the supposed curvature of space is entirely impossible. But even if it existed it would not explain the motions of the bodies as observed. Only the existence of a field of force can account for the motions of the bodies as observed, and its assumption dispenses with space curvature. All literature on this subject is futile and destined to oblivion. So are all attempts to explain the workings of the universe without recognizing the existence of the ether and the indispensable function it plays in the phenomena."

The discarding of the ether was one of the greatest tragedies of the 20^{th} century's physics. The working of the Universe cannot be explained on scientific basis without recognizing the existence of the ether. But, Stephen Hawking does not agree with this Universal fact that can be seen with any uncontaminated mind. In his Brief History of Time book, Hawking wrote, "that Einstein cut through the ether and solved the speed of light problem once and for all". In reality, however, Einstein introduced the biggest tragedy to physics. Space is 99.99% of the visible Universe, just like in the case of the atom. But, it is not an empty space as current physics claims. Thus, that means Einstein discarded 99.99% of the physical reality of the Universe.

*Jamal S. Shrair has a B.Sc. in Electrical Engineering from Canada’s Queen’s University and **a M.Sc.** in experimental and particle physics from the Eötvös Loránd University of Science in Budapest, Hungary. His M.Sc. thesis project was an investigation of cosmic muons using a Cherenkov detector. In his post-graduate studies, he joined the faculty of electrical engineering and informatics at the Budapest University of Technology and Economics, where he studied surface physics and electron devices. The title of his thesis project is „The application of Nanoporous Silicon Layers for Efficient Gas Sensors”.*

Featured image credit: Leonid 2

I thought this was going to officially admit that the Universe is 99.x % Plasma. (Ie The ‘physical’ of the Universe is Electrical.

As to the ‘reality’ of its humanly accepted model and investment of belief and identity – how much of that is really a personal and political agenda? How much is the desire to reveal or uncover the already true to a recognition and practical significance?

And here I have to emphasize that science has not yet understood the structure of the universe, nor does it know what matter, gravity, and magnetism, and in particular there is no idea how to form and what it originates from.

, I DO, TO GET THE SCIENCE,

THAT THERE IS NATURAL LAWS, AND SHOULD SHOW THAT THE PRINCIPLE IS THE UNCERTAINTY POWER OF CREATION, THE SPIRITUAL ENTITY OF THE UNIVERSE (SEU). Without this, the understanding of science is at the bottom of the “black hole of knowledge” of the true causes of the phenomenon.

In addition, the biggest misconception of science and error is that it does not accept that there must be something from which matter is formed and someone who does it. Science has discarded the existence of the AETHER substance, from which matter is formed. Two basic types of matter cause gravity and magnetism. Their mutual relations and various formation processes give all possible phenomena in the universe in the material-energy entity of the universe (MEEU).

Various theoretical fatamagers and misconceptions, such as the phenomenon of BB, the expansion of the universe, the existence of dark matter and energy, Einstein’s theory (fatamorgan), multiverse and similar nonsense, have led to the science of the “black hole of ignorance”.

I wish there is someone in the science who wants to know the true causes of the phenomenon, but to find those who can explain it. Here, I can bring out my knowledge, and if they are not true, through long discussion and conviction, one who has a higher level of awareness will be defeated.

It is therefore necessary to know what is magnetism and who challenges it and then there will be no problem understanding the phenomena in the universe.

I quote: If Aether is accepted, then everything will be easily defined for matter and its properties in various thermodynamic processes, …………

You can’t define aether as a solution. If things are getting easier to grasp one must be attentive for mistakes. I am not qualified to argue against Einstein and hets fellow followers but in special relativity theory there are a lot of equations who don’t have an explanation in nature

CHECK YOUR FIRST STORY TODAY ABOUT DOUB LKE BLACK HOLES ORBITING EACH OTHER IN ANDROMEDA! “the Black Hole myth”

Jamal is absolutely right when he says that Einstein made so many mistakes in this field of science.

Every conscious and ordinary man who deals with science must know that matter must form from a substance. The biggest scientific misconception is the assertion that a BB happened and everything came from nothing. The material-energy entity of the University (MEEU) is all obscure, measurable and tangible; which is matter in all forms and energies of various kinds. The greatest damage to science was made by those who rejected the existence of AETHER substance. Without this substance, Aether, there would be nothing in the MEEU.

Most importantly, science does not know and rejects the origin and cause of gravity and magnetism. In the formation of matter, its “aggregate states” have a “relational” backward connection in phenomena and magnetism and gravity. Why has science not yet clarified many phenomena in the MEEU? Because it “erased” AETHER, as a substance that filled the infinite universe.

The most dangerous contaminating agents in finding out the true causes of the phenomenon are the “pesticides” that Einstein and Lorenz spilled across the field of science. Not only is it illogical, it is also foolish to believe that space and time, through a “love affair” themselves, entangle themselves in a network in which they “love” the mass and thus generate “newborn” gravity. Another misconception is the formula F = m.c ^ 2. What physical connection has light velocity with mass m?

Even today’s researchers in particulate-particle installations are unaware that all these “found” particles originate from the contents of their “empty tubes, because there AETHER is there, which they” irritate “with increased magnetism and speed of movement, when Aether” sticks to particles “and a little” passage “until there is a collision, when he comes back he also discovered a job in” walking. “And that’s their Bozon is a Fatamorgana. If Aether is accepted, then everything will be easily defined for matter and its properties in various thermodynamic processes, when forming ma eries and her all shapes and particles and heavenly bodies.

Some very interesting research that supports this work. The physics Mafia should be put on notice that now that they have elevated Einstein his time in the limelight is thru and we need to advance the science on data not speculative theories with holes.

http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=468054EA092C3BBD87325E51BEB12264?doi=10.1.1.625.6337&rep=rep1&type=pdf

http://www.orgonelab.org/miller.htm

https://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0205070.pdf