Canada pulled out of Kyoto Protocol

canada-pulled-out-of-kyoto-protocol

Canada pulled out of the Kyoto Protocol on climate change Monday, saying the accord won’t help solve the climate crisis. It dealt a blow to the anti-global warming treaty, which has not been formally renounced by any other country.

Environment Minister Peter Kent said that Canada is invoking its legal right to withdraw and said Kyoto doesn’t represent the way forward for Canada or the world.

Canada, joined by Japan and Russia, said last year it will not accept new Kyoto commitments, but withdrawing from the accord is another setback to the treaty concluded with much fanfare in 1997.

The protocol, initially adopted in Kyoto, Japan, in 1997, is aimed at fighting global warming. Canada’s previous Liberal government signed the accord but did little to implement it and Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s Conservative government never embraced it.

Hannah McKinnon of the Climate Action Network Canada said formally withdrawing from Kyoto after the Durban, South Africa conference is a slap in the face of the international community.

“It’s a total abdication of our responsibilities,” McKinnon said.

Opposition New Democrat lawmaker Megan Leslie disputed the dollar figures involved and said there are no penalties under Kyoto. Leslie said pulling out saves the Conservatives from having to report that Canada is falling short of its Kyoto targets.

“It’s like we’re the kid in school who knows they’re gonna fail the class, so we have to drop it before that actually happens,” Leslie said.

Scientists say that if levels of greenhouse gases continue to rise, eventually the world’s climate will reach a tipping point, with irreversible melting of some ice sheets and a several-foot(meter) rise in sea levels.

They cannot pinpoint exactly when that would happen, but the two-decade-long climate negotiations have been focused on preventing global temperatures from rising more than 2 degrees Fahrenheit (1.2 degrees Celsius) above current levels by the end of this century.

Source: www.laramieboomerang.com

If you value what we do here, create your ad-free account and support our journalism.

Share:

Producing content you read on this website takes a lot of time, effort, and hard work. If you value what we do here, select the level of your support and register your account.

Your support makes this project fully self-sustainable and keeps us independent and focused on the content we love to create and share.

All our supporters can browse the website without ads, allowing much faster speeds and a clean interface. Your comments will be instantly approved and you’ll have a direct line of communication with us from within your account dashboard. You can suggest new features and apps and you’ll be able to use them before they go live.

You can choose the level of your support.

Stay kind, vigilant and ready!

$5 /month

  • Ad-free account
  • Instant comments
  • Direct communication
  • New features and apps suggestions
  • Early access to new apps and features

$50 /year

$10 /month

  • Ad-free account
  • Instant comments
  • Direct communication
  • New features and apps suggestions
  • Early access to new apps and features

$100 /year

$25 /month

  • Ad-free account
  • Instant comments
  • Direct communication
  • New features and apps suggestions
  • Early access to new apps and features

$200 /year

You can also support us by sending us a one-off payment using PayPal:

5 Comments

  1. People are starting to wake up from all brainwashing about the climate! I congratulate Canada for making a brave and wise choice and for setting a good example! I guess there are some truth to the mayan calendar and it´s talk about heightened consciousness. The future suddenly looks brighter!

  2. …and “yes!!!” It is the Scientific Community’s problem…

    Too often they choose to forget they are supposed to be focused on the ‘betterment of Mankind’, not on pushing the (often accidental) discovery envelope in genetic engineering and the like…

  3. Can hardly blame them when the main criteria is atmospheric Carbon loads…
    Especially given that the eruption of Iceland’s Eyjafjallajokul, undid what 20 years of Kyoto Protocol’s aim’s were… If nearby Katla erupts it is estimated to equal 20 years of the entire world’s fossil fuel emissions…

    The Kyoto Protocol is simply a Politician’s answer to the Scietific community’s problem…

    Once again the term “World Leaders” is a gross misnomer…

  4. Can hardly blame them when the main criteria is atmospheric Carbon loads…
    Especially given that the eruption of Iceland’s Eyjafjallajokul, undid what 20 years of Kyoto Protocol’s aim’s were… If nearby Katla erupts it is estimated to equal 20 years of the entire world’s fossil fuel emissions…

    The Kyoto Protocol is simply a Politician’s answer to the Scietific community’s problem…

    Once again the term “World Leaders” is a gross misnomer…

Leave a reply