Bedrock of vaccination theory crumbles as science reveals antibodies not necessary to fight viruses

Bedrock of vaccination theory crumbles as science reveals antibodies not necessary to fight viruses

While the medical, pharmaceutical, and vaccine industries are busy pushing new vaccines for practically every condition under the sun, a new study published in the journal Immunity completely deconstructs the entire vaccination theory.

It turns out that the body's natural immune systems, comprised of both innate and adaptive components, work together to ward off disease without the need for antibody-producing vaccines.

The theory behind vaccines is that they mimic infection by spurring B cells, one of the two major types of white blood cells in the immune system, to produce antibodies as part of the adaptive immune system. It is widely believed that these vaccine-induced antibodies, which are part of the more specific adaptive immune system, teach the immune system how to directly respond to an infection before the body becomes exposed to it.

But the new research highlights the fact that innate immunity plays a significant role in fighting infections, and is perhaps more important than adaptive immunity at preventing or fighting infections. In tests, adaptive immune system antibodies were shown unable to fight infection by themselves, which in essence debunks the theory that vaccine-induced antibodies serve any legitimate function in preventing or fighting off infection.

"Our findings contradict the current view that antibodies are absolutely required to survive infection with viruses like VSV (vesicular stomatitis virus), and establish an unexpected function for B cells as custodians of macrophages in antiviral immunity," said Dr. Uldrich H. von Andrian from Harvard Medical School. "It will be important to further dissect the role of antibodies and interferons in immunity against similar viruses that attack the nervous system, such as rabies, West Nile virus, and Encephalitis."

As explained by Dr. Russell Blaylock in a recent interview with Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, vaccines not only do not work as advertised, but they actually damage the body's innate immunity. Rather than teach the body how to respond to infections, vaccines actually inhibit the immune system's ability to produce TH2-type cytokines, and suppress cellular immunity, which is how the body protects itself against deadly viruses and bacteria.

So once again, the myth that vaccinations serve any sort of legitimate medical purpose has been deconstructed by breakthrough science. Regardless of whether or not the mainstream medical community wants to admit it, pro-vaccine ideology is increasingly finding itself in the dustheap of outmoded pseudoscience.

Sources for this article include:

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/242403.php
http://www.niaid.nih.gov
http://www.naturalnews.com/035335_vaccines_Dr_Blaylock_children.html

NaturalNews.com
By Ethan A. Huff

Tags: vaccines

Comments

katesisco 4 years ago

G Zimmer new book: Viruses of Earth The future of medicine: phages, mimiviruses, and mycoplasmas.

Cory Albrecht (@Bytor) 5 years ago

Let me see... - using Natural News, a rabidly anti-science website run be a complete lunatic who censors even the *polite* comments tha point out his errors - no actual citation of the peer-reviewed research that supposedly says what this article claims I'm guessing that this is the literature: http://www.cell.com/immunity/fulltext/S1074-7613%2812%2900057-X For "vaccine theory" (which doesn't actually exist asan actual coherent theory, like germ theory or evolutionary theory) then antibodies would have to be completely useless in acquiring immunity and vaccines having some other unknown mechanism responsible for their empirically proven efficacy. The researchers who wrote this paper, however, explicitly say the exact opposite. "Although neutralizing antibodies are undoubtedly effective prophylaxis against rhabdoviruses, our findings indicate that antibody therapy may be insufficient to treat existing rhabdoviral infections in nonimmune subjects, at least in the case of VSV." So this paper merely shows that there might be another way of preventing viral diseases other than using antibodies to stimulate T-cell production, one that relies on stimulating lymph node cells to wipe out the viral invader instead. Ironically, this will still require some form injection to prime the lymph system ahead of time in the same way that vaccines prime the immune system ahead of time. It may not be dead viruses to trigger antibody production but for all practical purposes it will still be a "vaccine". Also, this is *only* for viruses which enter subcuraneiusly and through the lymph system rather than breathing in airborne droplets, sharing drinks and the inevitable backwash or other bodily fluid transfer. In other words, it's not going to work for rhinovirus, flu, measles, mumps, diptheria, typhoid, polio or HIV. That title for this article? Utter bullshit.

will.i.ain't (@Cory Albrecht (@Bytor)) 4 years ago

"subcuraneiusly"?

grant 5 years ago

Hey, 'Doc',: Deaf beats Dead--or, worse than dead... I grew up in the '50s; I've seen polio first-hand. Seen the braces, the crutches, the iron lungs. When I was in grade school, one of my friends lost two older siblings; anothr lived in grinding poverty because his big sistr lived in an iron lung. Let's compare--one in ten thousand go deaf--or one in a thousand die, or worse. Those who fail to learn the lessons of history, doom their children to repeating them (to coin a paraphrase...) Sleep well, 'Doc', sleep well... G.

Doc Hilliard 5 years ago

Big Pharma Merck's MMR vaccine deafens children.

grant 5 years ago

Sure, why not? The mind can do wonderful things, and look at non-terminal rhinitis--while getting run down and depressed is the sure-fire way to get the sniffles, try (just try!) to find someone (anyone!) who's gotten a cold in that first week of falling in total, complete, absolutely unspeakably stupid head-over-heels True Love...hah? Sure wish positive thinking etc. worked for diptheria, or polio... G.

Tristan 5 years ago

Hey would you have a link or reference to the article you are talking about? Author : Issue : Date : Year ?

Post a comment

Your name: *

Your email address: *

Comment text: *

The image that appears on your comment is your Gravatar