Survey: Vaccinated children five times more prone to disease than unvaccinated children


An ongoing study out of Germany comparing disease rates among vaccinated and unvaccinated children points to a pretty clear disparity between the two groups as far as illness rates are concerned. As reported by the group Health Freedom Alliance, children who have been vaccinated according to official government schedules are up to five times more likely to contract a preventable disease than children who developed their own immune systems naturally without vaccines.

Released as its own preliminary study back in September 2011, the survey includes data on 8,000 unvaccinated children whose overall disease rates were compared to disease rates among the general population, the vast majority of which has been vaccinated. And in every single disease category, unvaccinated children fared far better than vaccinated children in terms of both disease prevalence and severity. In other words, the evidence suggests that vaccines are neither effective nor safe.

No study of health outcomes of vaccinated people versus unvaccinated has ever been conducted in the U.S. by CDC or any other agency in the 50 years or more of an accelerating schedule of vaccinations (now over 50 doses of 14 vaccines given before kindergarten, 26 doses in the first year),” wrote Louis Rain back in 2011 for Health Freedom Alliance about the survey.

As disclosed at VaccineInjury.info, vaccinated children are nearly twice as likely as unvaccinated children to develop neurodermatitis, for instance, a skin disorder marked by chronic itching and scratching. Similarly, vaccinated children are about two-and-a-half times as likely, based on current data, to develop a pattern of migraine headaches compared to unvaccinated children.

The numbers are even more divergent for asthma and chronic bronchitis, where vaccinated children are about eight times more likely than unvaccinated children to develop such respiratory problems. Vaccinated children are also far more likely to develop hyperactivity, hayfever, and thyroid disease, with their likelihood three times, four times, and a shocking 17 times higher, respectively, compared to unvaccinated children.

You can view the complete data, as it currently exists, here: http://journal.livingfood.us

Autism extremely rare among unvaccinated children

Where the gloves really come off on the issue, however, is with autism, the long-held point of contention in the vaccine safety debate. According to the data, only four of the 8,000 unvaccinated children that were included in the 2011 release of the study responded as having severe autism, which is a mere half of one percent of the overall population. Meanwhile the autism rate among the general population, as tabulated in the German KiGGS study used for comparison, is about 1.1 percent.

This means that vaccinated children are about 2.5 times more likely to develop severe autism compared to unvaccinated children, a shocking find when considering the medical establishment vehemently denies any link whatsoever between vaccines and autism. And as it turns out, the four unvaccinated children who reported severe autism all tested high for heavy metals, including mercury, which further indicts vaccines and their disease-causing adjuvants.

Though this correlation does not necessarily conclude causation, the overall disparity of disease rates between vaccinated and unvaccinated children at the very least points to a very strong connection that cannot be denied or dismissed. Even after accounting for bias, as the survey’s authors have tried to do over the years, the data continues to show much higher disease rates among vaccinated children compared to unvaccinated children.

In a similar but unrelated study conducted back in the 1990s, researchers found that the death rate among vaccinated children for infection with diphtheria, tetanus, and whooping cough (pertussis) is also twice as high, on average, compared to unvaccinated children.

Sources for this article include:


Source: NaturalNews
By Ethan A. Huff

If you value what we do here, create your ad-free account and support our journalism.


Your support makes a difference

Dear valued reader,

We hope that our website has been a valuable resource for you.

The reality is that it takes a lot of time, effort, and resources to maintain and grow this website. We rely on the support of readers like you to keep providing high-quality content.

If you have found our website to be helpful, please consider making a contribution to help us continue to bring you the information you need. Your support means the world to us and helps us to keep doing what we love.

Support us by choosing your support level – Silver, Gold or Platinum. Other support options include Patreon pledges and sending us a one-off payment using PayPal.

Thank you for your consideration. Your support is greatly appreciated.

Teo Blašković

$5 /month

  • Ad-free account
  • Clean user interface and fast browsing
  • Direct communication with us via chat and email
  • Suggest new features, content and applications
  • Early access to new apps and features

$50 /year

$10 /month

  • Ad-free account
  • Clean user interface and fast browsing
  • Direct communication with us via chat and email
  • Suggest new features, content and applications
  • Early access to new apps and features

$100 /year

$25 /month

  • Ad-free account
  • Clean user interface and fast browsing
  • Direct communication with us via chat and email
  • Suggest new features, content and applications
  • Early access to new apps and features

$200 /year

You can also support us on Patreon

support us on patreon

or by sending us a one-off payment using PayPal:

Commenting rules and guidelines

We value the thoughts and opinions of our readers and welcome healthy discussions on our website. In order to maintain a respectful and positive community, we ask that all commenters follow these rules:

  • Treat others with kindness and respect.
  • Stay on topic and contribute to the conversation in a meaningful way.
  • Do not use abusive or hateful language.
  • Do not spam or promote unrelated products or services.
  • Do not post any personal information or content that is illegal, obscene, or otherwise inappropriate.

We reserve the right to remove any comments that violate these rules. By commenting on our website, you agree to abide by these guidelines. Thank you for helping to create a positive and welcoming environment for all.


    1. What you believe, Barbara and what is possibly true maybe two different things. All everyone is asking it that you research it from different sources. Our own immune systems are all we have to fight viruses. Bacteria, fungi, mold and anything else can be taken care of with alternative medicines like they used before man-made vaccines. We have more diseases today than ever before. Just look at both sides of the story. Our own plants can, probably, cure everything that a human and other creatures, that we could ever contract. Give it a chance.
      If you believe in God then consider this; God didn’t give us vaccines, man did. God gave us plants (vegetation). Also most medications, I believe, are made up from plants anyway.

      Graham Miles

  1. When I studied this issue for a seminar I found it so loaded that I decided to track it back to Jenner. The govt of that time invested heavily in this dream and I guess that is the major problem. No govt likes to be wrong so even in the face of so many more people dying from those crude early experiments they couldn’t admit to being wrong. Money was a problem then, money is a problem now. It is very hard for the medical profession to look this one squarely in the face because they would then have to face up to how many children they have maimed and killed because they”beliiiieeeve in immunisation”.

    1. I fully agree with you. From my research I, too, have found that antibiotics are just another way of making an enormous amount of money. The medical profession is referred as a ‘Medical Practice’. Ouch that seems to very scary.

      Graham Miles

    1. Where is the evidence that *all* children would have developed small pox or polio? I would like to read that article.

      I agree wholeheartedly with *this* article, you see, I didn’t have my children vaccinated. My sons are now in their late 20’s, early 30’s and rarely had a cold or the flu growing up. Their cousins, fully vaccinated by the way, were *always* sick. One of my sons had chicken pox, the other measles, and neither illness was as severe as doctors had me believe it would be given they hadn’t been vaccinated.

      One day *everyone* will realize that the *poison* produced by pharmaceutical companies is all for profit. They are corporations interested in their bottom line, NOT your health. If Big Pharma actually cared about *you* they would produce *cures* for illnesses NOT medication to control symptoms.

    1. I don’t think anyone would say never use antibotics; use only in extreme cases which I have also read. Think about the history of medicine from the beginning to now and see for yourself what the results in every medical condition.

      Graham Miles

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *