EF-0, winds of 65 to 85 mph (105 to 137 kph)
Tornadoes are rated by the havoc they inflict, on a scale of 1 to 5. But to fully comprehend this scale, you have to see the aftermath.
After a tornado is reported, the National Weather Service deploys storm survey teams to analyze the damage. The teams analyze the damage and calculate the wind speeds necessary for the destruction.
The lowest tornado rating, EF-0, is reserved for minor damage. Above, an EF-0 tornado peeled back parts of the roof on a chicken barn in Ringgold, Georgia.
EF-0 twisters can destroy small, poorly built structures, like the garage pictured below. These weak tornadoes usually cause only light damage to well-built homes. They may peel back gutters or siding, snap branches or uproot shallow-rooted trees.
EF-1, winds of 86 to 110 mph (138 to 177 kph)
Twisters of the second-lowest rating can still wreck smaller structures, like the barn pictured above. Typically, EF-1 twisters strip away roofs, flip mobile homes, blow off doors and shatter windows.
Smaller twisters like EF-1 tornadoes can still be deadly. It doesn't take much to flip over a mobile home, and these manufactured homes become death traps during tornadoes. Trees can crash through them or the homes can roll and pin people underneath.
The widespread use of manufactured homes in Dixie Alley, the name for the tornado-prone Southeast United States, is one reason that the region has a high number of tornado-related deaths.
EF-2, winds of 111 to 135 mph (179 to 217 kph)
EF-2 tornadoes are when things get serious. These strong storms can tear the roof off a house, shift a house's foundation, snap large trees, lift cars off the ground and shoot boards like missiles.
EF-3, winds of 136 to 165 mph (219 to 265 kph)
An EF-3 tornado is strong enough to destroy entire stories of well-constructed houses, knock over trains, rip the bark from trees and toss heavy cars.
North Carolina's capital was recently hit with an EF-3 tornado. The twister ripped through 63 miles (101 kilometers) of Raleigh, killing five people. The strong storm leveled a warehouse, leaving behind a pile of rubble.
EF-4, winds of 166 to 200 mph (267 to 322 kph)
EF-4 tornadoes are strong enough to level sturdy houses, and rocket cars and other large objects.
On April 22, an EF-4 tornado hit the St. Louis area, leaving destroyed houses in its wake. The 2011 St. Louis EF-4 tornado traveled 22 miles (35 kilometers). As it strengthened, it shredded the roof of a crowded airport terminal. Remarkably, no one was killed by the massive twister.
EF-5, winds of over 200 mph (322 kph)
EF-5 tornadoes are the most powerful, and thankfully, the least common. These twisters are strong enough to blow away big houses and collapse tall buildings.
On May 3, 1999, an EF-5 tornado brought near total devastation to Moore, Oklahoma.
Tiny Greensburg, Kan., home to about 800 people, was hit by one of the largest tornadoes in recent memory. The colossal twister leveled at least 95 percent of the city and killed 12 people. (OurAmazingPlanet)
The Fujita Scale
Forecasters and researchers use a wind damage scale created by T. Theodore Fujita to classify tornadoes and sometimes the damage done by other wind storms. The F - for Fujita - scale uses numbers from 0 through 5. The ratings are based on the amount and type of wind damage. F-6 or higher rated tornadoes aren't thought to exist. The damage they would do would be "inconceivable."
The National Weather Service accepted the Fujita Scale for use in 1973 and Allen Pearson, then director of the National Severe Storms Forecast Center, added the Pearson Scales for tornado path length and path width, creating the Fujita-Pearson Scale. (NOAA)
Dr. T. Theodore Fujita first introduced The Fujita Scale in the SMRP Research Paper, Number 91, published in February 1971 and titled, "Proposed Characterization of Tornadoes and Hurricanes by Area and Intensity". Fujita revealed in the abstract his dreams and intentions of the F-Scale. He wanted something that categorized each tornado by intensity and area. The scale was divided into six categories:
- F0 (Gale)
- F1 (Weak)
- F2 (Strong)
- F3 (Severe)
- F4 (Devastating)
- F5 (Incredible)
The Fujita Scale is a well known scale that uses damage caused by a tornado and relates the damage to the fastest 1/4-mile wind at the height of a damaged structure. Fujita's scale was designed to connect smoothly the Beaufort Scale (B) with the speed of sound atmospheric scale, or Mach speed (M). Fujita explains explicitly that "F-scale winds are estimated from structural and/or tree damage, the estimated wind speed applies to the height of the apparent damage above the ground."
Over the years, the F-Scale has revealed the following weaknesses:
It is subjective based solely on the damage caused by a tornado
No recognition in difference in construction
Difficult to apply with no damage indicators
if the 3/4-mile wide tornado does not hit any structures, what F-scale should be assigned?
Subject to bias
Based on the worst damage (even if it is one building or house)
Overestimates wind speeds greater than F3
And the F-Scale has had its misuses over the years:
Too much reliance on the estimated wind speeds
Oversimplification of the damage description
Judge the F-scale by the appearance of the tornado cloud
Unrecognizing weak structures
Fujita recognized that improvement was necessary. He published his memoirs called Mystery of Severe Storms in 1992 updating the Fujita Tornado Scale to include an estimate of f-scale damage then selecting the F-scale as a combination of f-scales and types of structural damage.
For example, if a tornado knocks down the walls of an area of homes. If it is determined that the walls collapsed, then the damage assigned is F3. If it is a brick home, then that lowers the damage to F2. Then, according to the table since it was a brick structure, then you +1 making the rating F3. The Enhanced Fujita Scale
it must continue to support and maintain the original tornado database.; In other word, there must be some conformity to that of the F-Scale that is listed in the database. Other ideas were agreed to including:
- Consistent Assessment of Damage
- enhance description of damage with examples and photos
- include not only structures, but also vegetation
- base damage assignment on more than one structure, if available
- develop a PC-based expert system
- develop training materials
- enhance description of damage with examples and photos
- Data Collection
- maintain current tornado database
- surveys should include additional data
- mean and maximum damage path width
- basis for damage assignment
- latitude/longitude of where the path began and ended
- number of hours spent on the damage survey
- names of survey team member(s)
When using the EF-Scale to determine the tornado's EF-rating, begin with the 28 Damage Indicators. Each one of these indicators have a description of the typical construction for that category of indicator. Then, the next step is to find the Degree of Damage (DOD). Each DOD in each category is given and expected estimate of wind speed, a lower bound of wind speed and an upper bound of wind speed.
Let's take the earlier example, a tornado moves through a neighborhood and walls are knocked down of an area of homes. Here the Damage indicator would be #2, One or Two Family Residences (FR12). The typical construction for this fits being a brick veneer siding home. The DOD would be a 8, most walls collapsed in bottom floor. Thus, the estimated winds would be 127 - 178 mph with the expected wind speed of 152 mph. Now, taking this number to the EF-Scale, the damage would be rated EF-3 with winds between 136 - 165 mph.
Register/become a supporter
Your support is crucial for our survival. It makes this project fully self-sustainable and keeps us independent and focused on the content we love to create and share.
You'll receive your ad-free account for 20x faster browsing experience, clean interface without any distractions, ability to post comments without prior editorial check, all our desktop and mobile applications (current and upcoming) ad-free and with the full set of features available, a direct line of communication and much more. See all options.