Scientist terrified of geoengineering technology being developed under guise of halting global warming


A prominent climate scientist who's actively involved in developing technologies to thwart the natural weather patterns of the globe says he's disturbed by the prospect of having to make such drastic changes to the common order of things in order to fight so-called "global warming."

Dr. Matthew Watson from Bristol University in the UK told the media recently that he's "terrified" by many of the geoengineering projects currently in the works to thwart man-made climate change, which is still being hawked by many in mainstream science as a threat to humanity.

Speaking to the Daily Mail Online, Dr. Watson explained how futuristic technologies like spraying chemical particles into the sky to reflect sunlight back into space have the potential to disrupt how rain falls, how plants grow and how life lives.

Right now, Dr. Watson is working on a $2.8 million project of this exact nature. The plan is to inject sulfur particles into the earth's atmosphere with the stated goal of blocking the sun's rays from reaching Earth, ostensibly to keep the earth from getting too warm.

"Personally, this stuff terrifies me," Dr. Watson told reporters. "Whilst it is clear that temperatures could be reduced during deployment, the potential for misstep is considerable."

"By identifying risks, we hope to contribute to the evidence base around geoengineering that will determine whether deployment, in the face of the threat of climate change, has the capacity to do more good than harm."

Geoengineering will likely cause irreversible damage to planetary ecosystems

The simplistic nature of such projects ignores the immense level of irreversible damage that could result from interfering with the normal functions of the planet. By blocking sunlight, plants won't be able to engage in photosynthesis, for instance, which means no more oxygen and no more food.

Similarly, humans won't be able to obtain natural vitamin D if the sun's rays aren't allowed to penetrate the atmosphere, triggering an epidemic of vitamin D deficiency and resultant disease.

One proposed method of mitigating excess carbon dioxide, which many would argue isn't even a real problem, involves planting and irrigating millions of trees in the world's deserts. But this would directly counteract the natural reflection of sunlight from desert sands back into space, contributing to more warming.

Another proposal involves dumping iron particles into the world's oceans to supposedly improve the growth of photosynthetic organisms capable of absorbing carbon dioxide. But this concept would only further toxify the world's oceans, harming sea animals in the process.

Sulfur particles will destroy ozone layer, leaving animals and humans exposed to deadly radiation

Building upon an earlier idea pioneered by Dr. Watson, climate scientists are also working on ways to pump sulfur particles into the sky in order to disperse and reflect sunlight back into space. But this process threatens to destroy atmospheric ozone, leaving plants, animals and humans exposed to harmful solar radiation.

"Geoengineering will be much more expensive and challenging than previous estimates suggest and any benefits would be limited," maintains Professor Piers Forster from the University of Leeds, who has long tracked climate engineering projects of this type and determined them to be more threatening than beneficial.

Professor Steve Rayner from Oxford University, who specializes in the legal and ethical ramifications of geoengineering, seems to agree. He told the Daily Mail Online that too little is known about the long-term effects of geoengineering, including their impact on planetary ecosystems.

"Mostly it is too soon to know what any of these technology ideas would look like in practice or what would be their true cost and benefit," he stated.

Sources for this article include: [PDF]

Source: Natural News
Written by Jonathan Benson

Featured image credit: NASA

If you value what we do here, create your ad-free account and support our journalism.


Your support makes a difference

Dear valued reader,

We hope that our website has been a valuable resource for you.

The reality is that it takes a lot of time, effort, and resources to maintain and grow this website. We rely on the support of readers like you to keep providing high-quality content.

If you have found our website to be helpful, please consider making a contribution to help us continue to bring you the information you need. Your support means the world to us and helps us to keep doing what we love.

Support us by choosing your support level – Silver, Gold or Platinum.

Other support options include Patreon pledges, one-off payments using PayPal and purchasing products from our webshop.

Thank you for your consideration. Your support is greatly appreciated.

Teo Blašković

$5 /month

  • Ad-free account
  • Clean user interface and fast browsing
  • Direct communication with us via chat and email
  • Suggest new features, content and applications
  • Early access to new apps and features

$50 /year

$10 /month

  • Ad-free account
  • Clean user interface and fast browsing
  • Direct communication with us via chat and email
  • Suggest new features, content and applications
  • Early access to new apps and features

$100 /year

$25 /month

  • Ad-free account
  • Clean user interface and fast browsing
  • Direct communication with us via chat and email
  • Suggest new features, content and applications
  • Early access to new apps and features

$200 /year

You can also support us on Patreon

support us on patreon

or by sending us a one-off payment using PayPal:

Commenting rules and guidelines

We value the thoughts and opinions of our readers and welcome healthy discussions on our website. In order to maintain a respectful and positive community, we ask that all commenters follow these rules:

  • Treat others with kindness and respect.
  • Stay on topic and contribute to the conversation in a meaningful way.
  • Do not use abusive or hateful language.
  • Do not spam or promote unrelated products or services.
  • Do not post any personal information or content that is illegal, obscene, or otherwise inappropriate.

We reserve the right to remove any comments that violate these rules. By commenting on our website, you agree to abide by these guidelines. Thank you for helping to create a positive and welcoming environment for all.


  1. There is a very strong strand of the command and conquer modality in the technologism of the science that is being accepted as ‘Science’.
    Ignorance of true nature and arrogance of a rationality based on disconnected thinking result in the vanity and insanity of presuming and asserting power ‘OVER’ rather than navigating and discerning power of.
    The war against nature. The war against consciousness. The war against true presence. They are all absurd, insane and self-destructive.
    Fighting is the modality of denial. True nature, true presence and true communication are the light in which insanity is revealed absurd and allegiance is withdrawn. Fighting, perpetuates the fog of the dynamic of fear and conflict under which hidden agenda divides to rule… a nightmare of our own choosing.

  2. All of these experts, who are trying to be above nature, are not just scientists, but a kind of terminator, which some of his unnatural ideas they want to show that they are the ones who can change what nature, according to them, was not able to solve. Such “twisted minds” think that our planet is a sick and they will be going to cure it, but the problem is that I can put on the planet to their “operating table”. And the biggest mistake and the danger of such people is that they do not even know neither its existence nor know anything about who formed them. To know that they would not have occurred to the public amounts so stupid ideas and illogical actions.
    And climate change on the planet does not even depend on the amount of CO2, as is now the dust raised on the issue. Every normal man, when you compare its size to the size of the planet, we will see how he is small and poor in relation to nature and its forces and laws in the millennial cycles rotate and change. We do and we can not notice, because this nature is prohibited, as it would destroy the greed and self nature and intent to serve some other purpose, and not one that you would be imposed on such people.
    It should impose sanctions as such, because they act destructively on nature and our consciousness.

  3. I believe in letting nature settle it, yes we should all be careful of the imprint we leave behind, but really man is not causing that big a problem, let the earth complete this natural cycle. There are more undersea volcanoes causing more sea heat then man, and they are increasing, there is nothing we can do about that, volcanoes emit more C02 then man, one eruption is worse then the whole of mankind, and there is nothing we can do.

    We can only help that the computer models stop the scientists from destroying the earth, which they will do if they follow the path they are now on.

  4. Mankind is created to be: Heaven, Mankind, Earth; Heaven and Earth inside the Mankind; Heaven and Earth outside the Mankind… The combinations are too various to pinpoint; too deep to see through.

    Scientists, by definition, are sick humans physically. Their internal organs such as heart, intestines, liver, spleen, stomach, kidneys, bladder and etc, are all compromised; Their 5 senses have betrayed them. Human should live well beyond 100 years as told in all ancient cultures across the globe. So, what do these sick humans do? They sickly produce a word called nature, in a FINAL bid to hold onto their bullshit: objectivity. The sickness is, if nature is objective to humans, why NEVER has any shit invented by humans been compatible to the “nature”, since humans are part of the “nature” ? Any shit, yes, from plastic bottles to silicon chips, to petrol-chemical compounds, has to be “recycled”, i.e. burned to fumes to pollute the environment. This is why environmentalists are hypocrites. Scientists are hypocrites.

    Science has never done anything right. But scientists want money to pay their mortgages. So they always lie about what their technology can do to get the funding. Their owners have infiltrated every aspect of the controlled oppositions. No, there is no real opposition. You don’t have a choice. YOu have owners. They own you. George Carlin nailed the SOB. THe result is HARRP, Nano technology, missions to the Moon, Mars and Venus, landing on a comet, Voyager program, UFO crashing, retrieval and cover of its cover-up, oh, that god damn citizen hearing/ disclosure project organized by a very dubious man, Steven Greer, who continues to baffle them with bullshit, a phrase made famous by Goldman Sachs jews. We have technology right now that can send these alien beings back home. Really? When asked to be more specific, the bullshitter become very uncomfortable suddenly. SHould watch it. All he can muster is zero point energy. Use one one bullshit to explain another. That is all they can and need to do to maintain the modern owner-slave relationship. The woman who claims to be an assistant to Wernher Von Braun is another hired bullshitter. In contrast, the eye-witnesses from the nuclear missile sites are very specific and articulating, although overshadowed by the bullshitters.

    You see they will NEVER release the “free energy” technology. Because they don’t have it.
    But the dangling carrots and blackmail are good enough to keep the status quo.

    Que the music “The hebrew slaves chorus”.

    Truth must be able to be demonstrated. Hiding behind words or “mathematics” is cowardly. Science is cowardly. Modern medicine is cowardly.
    The darkest before the dawn. You think you know it is the darkest? There is always the darker right behind it. This is his creation. He does not compromise. He put the Jews down before, then raised them up. He will put them down again. Keeping licking the wall does not change their fate. Keeping the internet ponzi scheme will not change search engines’ fate.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *