Climate change halves Peru glacier
A glacier on Peru’s Huaytapallana Moutain shed half its surface ice in just 23 years, officials said Wednesday, reinforcing concerns of climate change’s growing threat to fresh water resources.
“Recent scientific studies indicate that between June 1983 and August 2006, the glacier has lost 50 percent of its surface ice,” Erasmo Meza, manager of natural resources and the environment in the central Andean region of Junin, told the official Andina news agency.
He said the five square kilometers (1.9 square miles) of ice shrinkage on Huaytapallana, whose steep, jagged glacier and breathtaking lakes are popular tourist draws, was caused by global warming and presents growing problems in agriculture, health, fresh water resources and disaster mitigation.
To prevent further deterioration on the 5,557-meter (18,230-foot) mountain, the regional government of Junin is developing a project to declare Huaytapallana a natural conservation area — a move Meza said could help prevent damage from a mining company doing a feasibility study in the area.
Glacier studies are often carried out in the Andes, the so-called “Roof of the Americas” region comprising more than 100 peaks above 5,000 meters (16,500 feet). But the Huaytapallana studies show a sharper rate of glacial melt than other major findings.
A 2009 World Bank-published report said that in the last 35 years, Peru’s glaciers have shrunk by 22 percent, leading to a 12 percent loss in the amount of fresh water reaching the coast — home to most of the country’s citizens.
It also warned that Andean glaciers and the peaks’ permanent snow caps could disappear in 20 years if no measures are taken to tackle climate change, echoing the findings of Peruvian agencies. One of the most threatened is Pastoruri, a 5,200-meter (17,060-foot) peak in Huascaran National Park in northern Peru that is home to Huascaran Mountain, Peru’s highest point at 6,768 meters (22,200 feet). (TerraDaily)
If you value what we do here, create your ad-free account and support our journalism.
Your support makes a difference
Dear valued reader,
We hope that our website has been a valuable resource for you.
The reality is that it takes a lot of time, effort, and resources to maintain and grow this website. We rely on the support of readers like you to keep providing high-quality content.
If you have found our website to be helpful, please consider making a contribution to help us continue to bring you the information you need. Your support means the world to us and helps us to keep doing what we love.
Support us by choosing your support level – Silver, Gold or Platinum. Other support options include Patreon pledges and sending us a one-off payment using PayPal.
Thank you for your consideration. Your support is greatly appreciated.
Commenting rules and guidelines
We value the thoughts and opinions of our readers and welcome healthy discussions on our website. In order to maintain a respectful and positive community, we ask that all commenters follow these rules:
We reserve the right to remove any comments that violate these rules. By commenting on our website, you agree to abide by these guidelines. Thank you for helping to create a positive and welcoming environment for all.
In Feb 2011 Mr Meza could not have said anything but the global warming hysteria. He would have been fired. I wonder if he is still a warmest or now admits that warming has been going on since the last Ice Age?
Lots of unanswered questions here. Is the glacier disappearing because of increased melting or decreased snowing? How old is it–from the LIA or the LGM? If it is ancient ice, melting is the only reason there has been a source of water, and it has always been finite and unreliable in the long term. All any warming has done is increase the water supply in the short term, making it run out a little sooner.
Is it now overflowing into the Pacific, or is it all being used? Would a dam help? It’s pretty hard to get up one’s goat about such an apparently manufactured crisis. –AGF