New MRI research reveals cancer cells thrive on processed sugar
Do you have a sweet tooth? If so, your dietary habits could be significantly adding to your risk of developing cancer. New research published in the journal Nature Medicine has confirmed that processed sugar is one of the primary driving forces behind the growth and spread of cancer tumors, so much so that the future of cancer screening could rely on scanning the body for sugar accumulation.
Scientists from University College London (UCL) in the U.K. made this discovery after experimenting with a new cancer detection method that involves utilizing a unique form of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). After sensitizing an MRI scanner to look specifically for glucose in the body, it was revealed that cancer tumors, which feed off sugar, light up brightly as they contain high amounts of sugar.
"The new technique, called 'glucose chemical exchange saturation transfer' (glucoCEST), is based on the fact that tumors consume much more glucose (a type of sugar) than normal, healthy tissues in order to sustain their growth," explains a recent UCL announcement, noting that tumors appear as "bright images" on MRI scans of mice.
Traditionally, cancer screenings have involved the use of low-dose radiation injections to identify the presence of tumors, which makes sense as radiation is another known cause of cancer. The things that trigger and promote cancer development and spread, in other words, can also be used by doctors to detect it inside the body. And now sugar can officially be added to this list.
"The method uses an injection of normal sugar and could offer a cheap, safe alternative to existing methods for detecting tumors, which require the injection of radioactive material," says Dr. Simon Walker-Samuel, lead researcher of the study from the UCL Centre for Advanced Biomedical Imaging (CABI).
Interestingly, it was also noted by the study's senior author that the amount of sugar in "half a standard sized chocolate bar" is all it takes to effectively identify the presence of tumors using the glucoCEST method. This is astounding, as it suggests that even relatively low amounts of sugar have the potential to promote cancer proliferation.
Many cancer tumors respond directly to insulin produced by sugar consumption
The UCL study is hardly the only one to have identified a connection between processed sugar consumption and diseases like cancer. Other research, including that being currently being conducted by Dr. Robert H. Lustig, M.D., a Professor of Pediatrics in the Division of Endocrinology at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), confirms that the bulk of chronic illnesses prevalent today are caused by sugar consumption.
You can watch a presentation from Dr. Lustig entitled Sugar: The Bitter Truth here: https://youtube.com
As far as cancer is concerned, hormones produced by the body in response to sugar consumption also feed cancer cells. This means that every time you down a soda or eat a piece of cake, your body produces certain chemicals that tell cancer cells to not only start taking up sugar, but also to grow in size and spread.
"What we're beginning to learn is that insulin can cause adverse effects in various tissues, and a particular concern is cancer," says Dr. Lewis Cantley, head of the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) at Harvard University, as quoted during an interview with CBS' 60 Minutes.
"If you happen to have a tumor that has insulin receptors on it, then it will get stimulated to take up the glucose that's in the bloodstream," he adds. "So rather than going to the fat or to the muscle, the glucose now goes into the tumor, and the tumor uses it to grow."
Sources for this article include:
Republished from NaturalNews
Written by Jonathan Benson
Featured image: sugar spoon by http://www.flickr.com/photos/72787861@N00/6472170417
If you value what we do here, create your ad-free account and support our journalism.
Your support makes a difference
Dear valued reader,
We hope that our website has been a valuable resource for you.
The reality is that it takes a lot of time, effort, and resources to maintain and grow this website. We rely on the support of readers like you to keep providing high-quality content.
If you have found our website to be helpful, please consider making a contribution to help us continue to bring you the information you need. Your support means the world to us and helps us to keep doing what we love.
Support us by choosing your support level – Silver, Gold or Platinum. Other support options include Patreon pledges and sending us a one-off payment using PayPal.
Thank you for your consideration. Your support is greatly appreciated.
Commenting rules and guidelines
We value the thoughts and opinions of our readers and welcome healthy discussions on our website. In order to maintain a respectful and positive community, we ask that all commenters follow these rules:
We reserve the right to remove any comments that violate these rules. By commenting on our website, you agree to abide by these guidelines. Thank you for helping to create a positive and welcoming environment for all.
I remember a few years back a friend of mine and I were talking about her nephew, who was 13 at the time and suffering with leukemia. She told me when the kids came out of chemo, DUPONT hospital in Delaware would give the kids slurrpys, as a treat.
What a Health System! How stupid can people be?? DuPont is suppose to be one of the top hospitals for children. Her nephew passed away, sadly. Maybe if more Health professionals would wise up and educate themselves with nutrition we'd have a lot less cancer deaths.
If it's glucose that is the problem then carbohydrates in general could be a big problem, as they are converted pretty quickly to glucose in the body, whether they are complex or refined carbohydrates.
This really is not new info. Worked for oncologists years ago and they knew sugar (in particular glucose) was loved by cancerous cells. Worst thing you can do if you have cancer is consume sugar.
This information has been known in many circles for quite some time. Insulin Potentiation Therapy developed in the 1930's is one example. It's great that it can be "proven" by imaging devices though and finally this important information will become mainstream.
If sugar is used for food, then: reducing sugar intake will begin to starve the virus or, adding something to the sugar to kill the virus will insure it will get to the organism efficiently. A man claims he cured his cancer by using such a treatment, youtube search: cancer cure baking soda sugar maple syrup. The problem is his treatment cost pennies….
Ah, duh! A pet scan (positron emission tomography) which has been used for many years uses glucose with a radioactive tag to be absorbed into a tumor. This is not new technology. Cancer cells are primitive anaerobic and use large amounts of glucose and no oxygen. Most people don't die from cancer but from the acidosis associated with the cells glucose metabolism.